Emily solicits answers from students and draws answers on the board:
Emily: Let's try to come up with a definition of a platonic solid. What are some properties that you think a platonic solid should have?
[Students volunteer ideas; Emily writes them on the board, using student language whenever possible and prompting for clarification when needed:]
Definition of a platonic solid
-------------------------------
- all faces are identical polygons
regular polygons
(equal sides, equal angles)
Emily: Is this it? Is it enough that the faces are all the same regular polygon?
Student: It's got to look the same from any face.
Emily adds:
- they ``look the same'' from any face.
Emily: What do you think? Is this enough? Let's take a vote.
[Class votes. Some people undecided. ]
Emily: I want you to break into small groups and try to come up with a shape that has the first property but not the other. So all faces are identical regular polygons, but the solid doesn't ``look the same'' from all faces.
[Class breaks into groups. No one comes up with an example solid that Emily asked for, but several students discovered:]
Emily: Someone's come up with a very interesting example, so let's all take a look.
[Emily leads class in discussion of why this example ``looks the same'' from every face]
Emily: Is this a platonic solid?
Students: No!
Emily: Why not?
[Emily and students have discussion, and a student says:] It doesn't look the same from every vertex.
Emily: Sounds like we should add something to the definition. What do you want to add?
- each vertex ``looks same''
i.e., has equal # edges
Student: What if we use hexagons?
Emily: Let's see.
[Emily works with students to find a way to glue hexagons together and arrive at:]
Emily: Let's take a vote. Is this a platonic solid?
Students: No.
Emily: Why not?
Students: It's not 3-D.
- 3-dim. i.e., a solid
[Emily and students discuss sum of angles around a vertex in the gluing. They decide that if the angle sum around a vertex is 360, then it determines a tiling of the plane, is therefore not a solid, and therefore not a platonic solid.]
Student: What about octagons?
Other student: That won't work.
Emily: Why not?
Student: Because it's greater than 360.
Emily: That's right. What do you think it would look like if you tried to glue octagons?
[Students and Emily discuss; conclude that octagon gluings could create crinkles--if we persisted in gluing octagons to each other, we would eventually get a ``crazy tutu'' called the hyperbolic plane.]
[Emily helps students summarize their findings:]
[Emily discusses optional project: take a bunch of equilateral triangles and glue them so that each vertex is contained in exactly 7 faces and each edge is contained in exactly 2 faces. Alternatively, take a bunch of squares and glue them so that each vertex is contained in exactly 5 faces and each edge is contained in exactly 2 faces.]
Emily: Okay, I think we are ready to prove a theorem.
Emily: How can we prove this?
[After some discussion, some student suggests looking at triangles.]
Emily: Is there a platonic solid using triangles if we glue 2 to a point?
[Students decide no-- does not form a solid.]
[Emily helps students create and discuss a case analysis. Some cases result in platonic solids, some don't form a solid. Some are ``wacky hyperbolic''.]
Emily: Now that we've done this proof, let's see if we
can take this in another direction. What about 4-D?
Anyone know of a 4-dimensional platonic solid?
Student: hypercube?
[Emily draws a diagram of a hypercube on the board and
then shows off a zometool model of a hypercube.]
Emily: There are vertices, edges, faces, and these 3-dimensional faces that we'll call facets so we're not confused.
[Students discuss lower-dimensional cubes. Decide that a 2-dimensional cube is a square and a 1-dimensional cube is a line segment.]
Emily: Let's tabulate something. How many vertices does a line segment have?
2
line segment ______ vertices
4
square ______ edges
6
cube ______ faces
?
hypercube ______ facets
[Students guess that a hypercube must have 8 facets.
They verify it using the zometool model of the
hypercube.]
Emily: Let's unfold a cube. What does it look like? ...
What do you think unfolding a hypercube would look like?
Student: But which one stays the same when you fold it?
[Through discussion, Emily discovers that
student wants 4-dimensional analog to placing
a cube blueprint on a table and folding up the
cube while fixing the center square in the blueprint.
[Class explores how to fold up a tesseract with ``4-dimensional
paper.'']
Emily: Anyone heard of another 4-dimensional solid other than a hypercube?
Student: Is there a hypertetrahedron?
Emily: Let's see what that would be.
#vertices
line segment 2
triangle 3
tetrahedron 4
hypertetra?
[Students guess 5]
Emily: It's kind of like a cone [and describes].
At this point, we're running out of time, so
let's see if we can come up with another 4-dimensional solid.
[Emily coaxes students into guessing the name hyperoctahedron
and discusses how to visualize it by analyzing cube.
The corner of a cube looks like a triangle.
The corner of a hypercube looks like a tetrahedron.
Corners of cubical facets stick into faces of tetrahedra.
Hyperoctahedron gotten by sticking tetrahedra into
tetrahedra.]
Student: What's so special about tetrahedra?
Emily: That's a good question. What other shapes can we use?
Student: Cubes.
[Emily discusses use of cubes and adding up radial angles]
Student: What about octahedra?
[Discussion continues; class comes to a close.]
Emily: If you want to look at pretty pictures and read more about platonic solids, you should look at John Baez's page. [Writes url on board]
[Graduate student in back loads up page with graphics and high school students turn to look. They begin to pack up and a few stay to take a closer look at the graphics. One stays to talk to Emily about the Hampshire summer program for high school students.]